Strong Army

Recently I was watching the commercial of US Army - 'us is strong because of strong army. and strong army is because of strong soilder'
I think I got two big questions in my mind. first at this ironic timing, which GOP got defeated badly by democratic because of Iraq. should people think about the meaning of 'strong US'? on convention power us is much more strong than before, compare to vietnam war. but is US really stronger? that is a excellent question.. but at least onething for sure. no one including us's past alliances would to see the strongness of US. they actually would prefer to find something to balance or even eliminate the influence of US. the powerless of us in handling iran and north korea are already a sign. and a bad sign. us is strong but losing friends
second, until when this 'strong army concept' will be gone. army could be used in only two scenarios - invasion and defencing turf. the power of invasion does not ensure the success. Iraq is already a sample. defencing the homeland? that is the last resort of defence. it seems strong army is the last priority. it would be preferred to have strong air force, navy and marine, even space force, before strong army.

I am feeling smarter enough people should avoid army. Let robot do the army job.